From this article.
Seems to me that if the would-be justice's ideology would lead them to interpret the Constitution such that the federal government can grow without limit then that candidate is not qualified to be on the Supreme Court.
The ideology of the nominee should be under consideration here, not the ideology of our representatives.
This is the kind of decision that will impact the rest of our lives. We better get it right.
A blog about living, hunting, and whatever else I want.
Just Another Right Wing Extremist
Founding Member of The Party of NO
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(472)
-
▼
August
(71)
- Lockerbie bomber released as part of oil deal
- Quote of the Day ****Now with Pics****
- Pic of the Day
- What qualifies as a "cybersecurity emergency"?
- Just when you thought it couldn't get any worse - ...
- 1000 banks to fail in the next two years - finally...
- Home of the Firehat
- The Average I.Q. in the senate is up today
- New Law in TX - What is going on!?
- Ban All Pseudoephedrine NOW!! It's for, uh, I hav...
- Dems plan pro-socialized medicine rallies
- Yes We Can Increase the Debt Even More
- A great ad in the paper
- Save Glenn Beck
- Great Video
- A little fun at the range
- Want to help someone find housing?
- Mexico decriminalizes small amounts of cocain, her...
- Socialized medicine again
- Oh please!! Another "right-wing conspiracy"!!
- I'm listening to a guy try to find out about the r...
- Quote of the Day
- Is this payback for opposing "The Chosen One"?
- Firms with ties to the President profit from push ...
- Socialized Medicine Quote of the Day
- Rule of Government
- The Next Big Bailout: Social Security?
- So auto dealers are having trouble getting their m...
- Consumer Confidence Falls "unexpectedly" in August
- Getting ready for hunting season
- I need some extra wide mud boots
- I heard on the radio that the stock market will pr...
- Dropping "Public Option"
- Durban upset that he won't be able to tell his con...
- A useful item to have: cable ties
- Finished the first rabbit hutch
- Dallas Independent School District wants to rename...
- Holy Foreclosures!!!
- I'm feeling so good about the economy this morning
- Flu hasn't been in the news here so much lately
- Foreclosures Rise
- Predicting the stock market to go back down
- Biometric Authentication for anyone seeking employ...
- I had to post this
- A "Chief Diversity Officer"!!!?? What is that?
- A lefty at work
- Soaring deficits defy forcasts? Are you kidding?
- A rise in militia groups?
- Congressman Scott's Sign
- Story about my dad's dad
- Socialized Medicine, Logan's Run, and Cutting Costs
- Pat Buchanan Column Worth Reading
- My Little Girl's Nails
- Defensive Shotgun
- Easy Fill Chicken Waterer
- Sotomayor confirmed
- #2 Son's Birthday Cake
- Fried baby egg and cheese bagel
- Union goons to counter town hall protesters
- Walter E. Williams on socialism
- Sotomayor and "voting on ideology rather than qual...
- Good and Politically Incorrect article
- Solution to Congress
- Russian Nuclear Subs off East Coast
- Not posting much lately
- Socialism
- Socialized Medicine Not So Great for Cancer
- Sunday update
- Geithner says they're going to raise taxes on the ...
- One of our Rhode Island Reds laid her first egg today
- Alabama County Prepares for the Government to Shut...
-
▼
August
(71)
About Me
My Blog List
-
-
Brown Bagging It4 days ago
-
Fuck the European Union6 years ago
-
-
-
Be Advised7 years ago
-
-
Grateful That It Wasn't Worse7 years ago
-
-
6 Prepper Tips to Start Now8 years ago
-
-
-
Last Call!10 years ago
-
Portugal Vacation Spots10 years ago
-
Merry Christmas to Everyone10 years ago
-
Get Home Bag11 years ago
-
And just like that.....12 years ago
-
They Don't Belong12 years ago
-
-
Website update and more12 years ago
-
-
Bibi Heils Hitler ...13 years ago
-
Short Hairstyles 1813 years ago
-
Live and Learn14 years ago
-
Open Thread14 years ago
-
This Blog Has Moved!14 years ago
-
Bright Lining Panfish on Ice14 years ago
-
The Christmas Season14 years ago
-
DID IT MY WAY has passed on 7-29-201015 years ago
-
-
I moved!15 years ago
-
-
Going Dark16 years ago
-
Are We Really Smarter?16 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-


1 comment:
I agree - Mel Martinez finds it "Very, Very appalling" that people are looking at her ideology rather than her "qualifications".
Dumb ass.
The qualifications that he and everyone else touts would be fine if you were looking at hiring her as a lawyer. But that's not the position she's being considered for, is it? She's being considered for a position where she will interpret law and determine whether its application jibes with the Constitution, or not.
I would think that her track record and constitutional ideology would be even MORE important to consider than the other stuff.
But then again, I think people should actually read bills before signing them into law, so what do I know?
Post a Comment